Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>> FWIW, I'd vote for dumping all of these into *one* rmgrdesc directory
>> (which may as well be under access/ since that's where the xlog code is),
>> regardless of where the corresponding replay code is in the source tree.
>> I don't think splitting them up into half a dozen directories adds
>> anything except confusion.  If you want, the header comment for each
>> file could mention where the corresponding replay code lives.

> Done that way.

Looks pretty sane to me.  The only thing that seems worth discussing is
whether to put the smgr-related XLOG record declarations in storage.h
as you have here, or to invent a new, more private header for them.

There are XLOG record declarations cluttering a lot of other fairly
public headers; but given that we've invented files like heapam_xlog.h
of late, maybe we should start trying to push those declarations to
less-visible spots.  Or maybe it's not worth the trouble.

                        regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to