On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 20:03, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Sure. If I can get one more 'yes' I will submit a new patch with the > change. It does prevent the namespace collision without mucking up > pg_shadow. We only need to tell people that global users need to supply > their username to the client as user@. Is that cleaner?
I will vote yes for this change. I think the flexibility this new system offers will make it much easier for people to offer PostgreSQL hosting facilities, of which I would like to see many more. -- Oliver Elphick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Isle of Wight, UK http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C ======================================== "And whatsoever ye shall ask in my name, that will I do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son." John 14:13 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
