Sorry for long absence. On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: > IIRC, the reason why postgresql_fdw instead of pgsql_fdw was > no other fdw module has shorten naming such as ora_fdw for > Oracle. > However, I doubt whether it is enough strong reason to force to > solve the technical difficulty; naming conflicts with existing user > visible features. > Isn't it worth to consider to back to the pgsql_fdw_validator > naming again?
AFAIR, in the discussion about naming of the new FDW, another name postgres_fdw was suggested as well as postgresql_fdw, and I chose the one more familiar to me at that time. I think that only few people feel that "postgres" is shortened name of postgresql. How about using postgres_fdw for PG-FDW? Regards, -- Shigeru HANADA -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
