On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 12:19 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Robert Haas escribió: > > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Guillaume Lelarge > > <guilla...@lelarge.info> wrote: > > > Any comments on this? > > > > I'm not sure I'd want to back-patch this, since it is a behavior > > change, but I do think it's probably a good idea to change it for 9.3. > > Hm, but the bug is said to happen only in 9.2, so if we don't backpatch > we would leave 9.2 alone exhibiting this behavior. >
Yeah, Alvarro got it right. The behaviour changed in 9.2. This patch needs to be applied on 9.2 and master, nothing else. If the patch is good enough though... -- Guillaume http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info http://www.dalibo.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
