On 09/22/2012 01:57 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
Andrew,
Below is the patch that I mentioned at pgOpen. I'm pretty sure my
silly github pull request got screwed up anyway, so probably best to
ignore it. Regardless, please let me know what you think. I'd be
happy to rework it to operate off of a single hash, though I think
that would require having 'one true hash' of all possible steps and
it kind of looked like you were trying to avoid that.
I'm not sure it's a great advance, but I'll take a look. In any case
please sent it as a proper MIME attachment. It did not come through
clean. Alternatively, and probably better, put this on a topic branch
that I can git-fetch (that's recommended practice for github pull
requests too).
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
