于2012年9月17日 12:47:11,Tom Lane写到:
Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes:
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 09:48:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Well, that's even stranger, because (1) information_schema.sql_features
ought to have a toast table in either version, and (2) neither pg_dump
nor pg_upgrade ought to be attempting to dump or transfer that table.
I bet pg_upgrade is picking it up from the old cluster because it has an
oid >= FirstNormalObjectId and the table is not in the information
schema.
If it *isn't* in information_schema, but is just some random table that
happens to be named sql_features, then it's hard to explain why there's
anything going wrong at all. My money is on the OP having done a reload
of the information_schema (as per, eg, the release notes for 9.1.2), and
somehow that's confusing pg_dump and/or pg_upgrade.
ah yes yes, now I can remember it! I have followed the release notes
and re-created the whole information_schema schema.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
