On 05.09.2012 07:55, Dimitri Fontaine wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas<hlinn...@iki.fi> writes:
I was worried about that too at first, but Fujii pointed out that's OK: see
last paragraph at
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-08/msg01203.php.
Mmm, ok.
I'm worried about master-standby-standby setup where the master
disappear, we promote a standby and the second standby now feeds from
the newly promoted standby. Well we have to reconnect manually in this
case, but don't we need some similar stopgaps?
The second standby will have to reconnect, but it will happen automatically.
- Heikki
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
