Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of mié ago 29 11:32:04 -0400 2012: > Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mar ago 28 17:27:51 -0400 2012:
> > This should > > reduce the number of changes needed, not only in our code but third > > party code. Not sure if the new file could sanely be called > > "htup_private.h"; it seems a bit widely used for that. Maybe "heap.h"? > > Not sure I really like heap.h, but let's put that aside for a moment. ... we already have catalog/heap.h, so that would be one reason to avoid that name. -- Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
