> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Tatsuo Ishii <is...@postgresql.org> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I found following item in the Developer FAQ. >> I don't see why this is related to developers. >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Why aren't there more compression options when dumping tables? >> > > it looks more like a TODO, or we think we are not interested on this? > if the latter, then it probably is part of the "things we don't want" > of the dev faq > > btw, the previous item is this: > "Why don't you use threads, raw devices, async-I/O, <insert your > favorite wizz-bang feature here>?" > > what's the difference about the async-I/O mentioned here and > "synchronous_commit=off", if there is none maybe we should remove that > part
BTW, this: >> Why aren't there more compression options when dumping tables? is a subsection of this: > "Why don't you use threads, raw devices, async-I/O, <insert your> favorite > wizz-bang feature here>?" I don't see any relationship between former and latter. -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
