Boszormenyi Zoltan <z...@cybertec.at> writes:
>>> Try SET deadlock_timeout = 0;
Actually, when I try that I get
ERROR: 0 is outside the valid range for parameter "deadlock_timeout" (1 ..
2147483647)
So I don't see any bug here. The places that are unconditionally doing
"enable_timeout_after(..., DeadlockTimeout);" are perfectly fine. The
only place that might need an if-test has already got one:
if (StatementTimeout > 0)
! enable_timeout_after(STATEMENT_TIMEOUT, StatementTimeout);
else
! disable_timeout(STATEMENT_TIMEOUT, false);
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
