Yes, it's a bug and it needs to be applied ! On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 7:44 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >>> On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Alexander Korotkov >>> <aekorot...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> I think we definitely should apply this patch before 9.2 release, because >>>> it >>>> is a bug fix. Otherwise people will continue produce incorrect GiST indexes >>>> with in-core geometrical opclasses until 9.3. Patch is very simple and only >>>> changes few lines of code. >>>> >>>> Any thoughts? >> >>> Do we need to apply this patch to 9.2? >> >> It's been like that all along, no? > > Yeah, but it seems an awful lot like a bug. In fact... it's hard to > imagine how it could be any more of a bug than this. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
