Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Whilst looking around for some more PostgreSQL related stuff, this
> message turned up:
> http://mail.wirex.com/pipermail/sardonix/2002-February/000051.html
I see one unsubstantiated allegation about PG intermixed with a ton
of content-free navel-gazing. Don't waste my time.
There was some considerable effort awhile back towards eliminating
unsafe printfs in favor of snprintfs and similar constructs; I doubt
that the comments in that message postdate that effort.
I have no doubt that some problems remain (cf recent agonizing over
whether there is a buffer overrun problem in the date parser) ...
but unspecific rumors don't help anyone. As always, the best form of
criticism is a diff -c patch.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
