On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:48:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:38:42AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> We already support multiple TCP sockets, so multiple Unix sockets > >> shouldn't be that much extra trouble. > > > We do? I didn't think listening on multiple interfaces meant we > > listened on multiple sockets. Is there something else? > > There's one socket for each entry in the listen_addresses list, > plus one for the Unix socket.
Oh, how do we handle '*'? We pass that to the kernel, I assume. Shame there is "wildcard" ability for unix domain sockets, which would use any directory --- guess that wouldn't work out well. ;-) -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
