On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > On sön, 2012-06-10 at 13:43 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: >> > On tis, 2012-05-29 at 22:31 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: >> >> Yeah, good arguments all around, i agree too :-) Next question is - >> >> suggestions for naming of said paramter? >> > >> > --xlog-method=something? And/or -Xsomething, which would automatically >> > enable -x? >> >> How's this? > > I wouldn't make -x and -X exclusive. The way I understood this is, -x > means include xlog, and -X says how to. > > I guess either way of looking at it has its merits.
I guess it's basically two ways of doing the same thing. I'm not especially attached to either one of them, so if you think the ohter one is better, I won't object to changing it. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
