On 8 June 2012 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would be more open to warning people about CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE > - frankly, it's pretty wonky that we allow that but treat GLOBAL as a > noise word in this first place. But I'm a little disinclined to have > the message speculate about what might happen in future versions of > PostgreSQL. Such predictions don't have a very good track record of > being accurate.
Agreed. We should make use of GLOBAL throw an ERROR: feature not yet implemented, in preparation for what might one day happen. We don't know the future but we do know the present. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
