Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 31 May 2012 13:16, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Frankly, I think this whole thing should be pushed to 9.3.
> What matters is that we have a patch that provides a massive
> performance gain in write performance in just a few lines of code, and
> that should be committed to 9.2.
I agree with Robert on this. This patch hasn't had *nearly* enough
testing to justify cramming it into 9.2 at this point. AFAIK the
claim of "massive performance gain" is based on a single test case run
by a single person, which doesn't even give me any confidence that it
doesn't break anything, much less that it's a win across the board.
If we want to finish the beta cycle in a reasonable time period and get
back to actual development, we have to refrain from adding more
possibly-destabilizing development work to 9.2. And that is what
this is.
Add it to the upcoming CF, please.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
