On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:46:56PM -0700, Robert Haas wrote: > On May 10, 2012, at 4:19 PM, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > > On 05/10/2012 06:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> How about a hybrid: we continue to identify patch authors as now, that is > >> with names attached to the feature/bugfix descriptions, and then have a > >> separate section "Other Contributors" to recognize patch reviewers and > >> other helpers? > > > > works for me. > > Me, too.
That does not work for me. There is no practical reason for a list of names to appear in the release notes. I suggest if we want to do that that we remove all names from the release notes (as Tom suggested), and create a wiki for credit, and link to that from the release announcement. That would allow us to put company names in there too. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
