Hackers,
Shouldn't a call to elog(NOTICE) invalidate the current tranaction?
david=# begin;
BEGIN
Time: 0.178 ms
david=# do language plperl $$ elog(ERROR, 'foo')$$;
ERROR: foo at line 1.
CONTEXT: PL/Perl anonymous code block
david=# select true;
bool
------
t
(1 row)
Time: 0.203 ms
The docs say:
> ERROR raises an error condition; if this is not trapped by the surrounding
> Perl code, the error propagates out to the calling query, causing the current
> transaction or subtransaction to be aborted.
So I'm surprised that the transaction is not aborted. Bug?
David
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
