On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>>> Then reviewers should be removed. >>> >>> I disagree. We're trying to get more reviewers, and encourage them to >>> do more reviewing. Giving credit is a big part of that. >> >> Are you disagreeing with Bruce's premise, my logic, or the conclusion? > > Hah, good point. I'm disagreeing with the conclusion that reviewers > should be removed, unless we're going to remove everyone *and* give them > credit elsewhere. Which I would also be in favor of, I'm just not able > to do the work right now.
Well, the problem with the way it is right now is that we're giving similar amounts of credit for very different amounts of contribution, which IMHO is no good. I think that putting a "Credits" section at the bottom and listing contributors there would be a reasonable solution; I also think that crediting people on a web page or in some other place would be a fine solution. What we have right now manages to be both unfair and unreadable. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
