On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:46:28PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On tor, 2012-05-03 at 15:47 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Peter, where are we on this? > > I hadn't received any clear feedback, but if no one objects, I can > commit it.
I think there were enough people that wanted some kind of control in this area. I did give you feedback on the patch. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 08:16:59PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > On fre, 2012-03-23 at 07:52 -0700, David Fetter wrote: > > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:05:30PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > > > > On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > >Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the > > > > > >fact that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to > > > > > >use my capslock key (which I use as a second control key). Any > > > > > >chance of reverting this change? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should it be governed by a setting? > > > > > > > > Something like (upper|lower|preserve) ? > > > > > > How about this patch then? (There are actually four possible settings, > > > see patch.) > > -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
