On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > ... > > *Eventually*, a simple checkout of 'pgsql' should result in a "server > > only" distribution that we can pull bits and pieces into transparently ... > > I'm still not quite sure where this is headed or why, but if nothing > else pgsql could and should be the whole thing, and pgsql-server could > be the server subset. Server-only makes sense for only some users, and > nothing apparently makes sense for everyone. But we may as well have the > old names do the old things...
will make those changes in the morning ... ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly