On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > The problem I've found with most tools is that they work reasonably > well if you let them control the entire workflow. But when you want to > do things your own way, and it doesn't match up with what they were > originally designed to do, it all comes falling down quickly...
That's pretty much characteristic of the average SAP R/3 project. If you can change the organization's business processes to follow SAP's defined "best practices," then it's easy to install and use R/3. But that normally not being the case, every "SAP project" winds up having hideous customization costs to kludge the practices towards one another. -- When confronted by a difficult problem, solve it by reducing it to the question, "How would the Lone Ranger handle this?" -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
