On 18 April 2012 13:44, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > ... I think you'll find a lot of that data could be mined out of our > historical commit logs already. I know I make a practice of mentioning > "bug #NNNN" whenever there is a relevant bug number, and I think other > committers do too. It wouldn't be 100% coverage, but still, if we could > bootstrap the tracker with a few hundred old bugs, we might have > something that was immediately useful, instead of starting from scratch > and hoping it would eventually contain enough data to be useful.
Just as a data point, git tells me that there are 387 commits where the commit log message matches '#\d+', and 336 where it matches 'bug #\d+'. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
