On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I can see a usecase for having a pg_size_pretty(numeric) as an option. >>> Not necessarily a very big one, but a >0 one. >> >> +1. > > +1, too.
I did some beautification of this patch. I think the attached version is cleaner and easier to read. Thoughts? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
sizepretty_v4.patch
Description: Binary data
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
