On ons, 2012-04-11 at 14:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I hear you ... but, given that the source material is a mailing-list > thread, *somebody* has to do all that work to produce an acceptable > commit. And if you're just going to commit what that somebody sends > you without further review, then you might as well give that person a > commit bit, because you're trusting them to get all this right.
I'd still review it, but I'd be able to spend say 3 minutes on review and 30 seconds on committing it, versus 3 minutes on review, 3 minutes on research, and 8 minutes on bookkeeping. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
