On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> No matter what we end up doing here it will be consistent with >> something; I am reminded of the phrase "the good thing about standards >> is that there are so many to choose from...". > > Well, FWIW I vote for making the new columns be float8 msec. If you > don't want to change total_time to match, I guess there's no law that > says it *has* to be consistent ...
Ugh. So the three ways of doing timing that we have already aren't enough, and we need a fourth one? Ack! -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
