Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Sorry, I think I wasn't making myself clear. I think that's a > splendid idea. But I'm not sure it's worth paying for it by making > users who want the whole thing download multiple packages. Maybe I'm > alone in thinking that, however, and it's not like I feel terribly > strongly about it. How much work is to make two packages - 'core' and 'complete'. Plus additional package called 'util' = 'complete' minus 'core'. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 item... Neil Conway
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3... Tom Lane
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Open... Marc G. Fournier
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ... Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Brett Schwarz
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Jeff MacDonald
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Bruce Momjian
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Marc G. Fournier
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Iavor Raytchev
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Jeff MacDonald
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] ... jtv
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Marc G. Fournier
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKE... Jeroen T. Vermeulen
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3... Marc G. Fournier
- Re: Trim the Fat (Was: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3... Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3 item... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open 7.3... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Trim the Fat (Was: Re: Open... Marc G. Fournier