On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: >> Maybe we should just not worry about this. > > That's been my reaction right along. There's no evidence that PID > recycling is a problem in the real world.
I'm entirely willing to acquiesce to that point of view. I only thought this was the blocker as to why pg_terminate_backend was left out of the pg_cancel_backend patch. In that thread, I have since posted the simpler "just let it happen" version. -- fdr -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
