On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Jaime Casanova <ja...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >>> >>> I haven't looked through the code in detail, but one direct comment: >>> do we really need/want to send this through the stats collector? It >>> will only ever have one sender - perhaps we should just either store >>> it in shared memory or store it locally and only send it on demand? >>> >> >> fyi, i intend to send a reworked patch later today, it will store the >> info locally and send it on demand. > > Jaime, > are you planning to submit the updated version of the patch?
Hearing no response, I have marked this patch Returned with Feedback. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
