Tom Lane writes: > > (5) is not really needed if we > > take pg_dump's current approach of associating a language with the > > namespace of the underlying function. > > Well, do you like that? It was only a quick hack to get pg_dump > running with schemas; I'm not convinced we really want it to act > that way.
We should probably put the languages into a schema. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
