On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote:
>      * It's not terribly important to me to be able to run checkers
>        separately.  If I wanted to do that, I would just disable or
>        remove the checker.

Does this requirement mean that you want to essentially associate a
set of checkers with each language and then, when asked to check a
function, run all of them serially in an undefined order?

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to