On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> wrote: > * It's not terribly important to me to be able to run checkers > separately. If I wanted to do that, I would just disable or > remove the checker.
Does this requirement mean that you want to essentially associate a set of checkers with each language and then, when asked to check a function, run all of them serially in an undefined order? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers