Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes:
> I guess the question is whether this is a stop-ship item for spgist.
> If it is, then we're going to have to spend the time to fix this, but
> if not, then since it was submitted more than two weeks after the
> start of the CommitFest, it seems we should postpone it to 9.3.
If we buy into the assumption that nulls support can/should be bolted on
after the fact, then postponing it to 9.3 would be reasonable. I wasn't
very happy with that idea though, and would like to look at this issue
before 9.2 gets frozen. So please don't pull it from the CF yet.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
