Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote: > Incidentally, I contend that we should write frozen tuples to > new/truncated tables unconditionally. +1 > The current behavior of making old snapshots see the table as > empty violates atomicity at least as badly as letting those > snapshots see the future-snapshot contents. Right, there was no point where the table existed as empty at the end of a transaction, so it is quite broken as things stand now. > But Marti has a sound proposal that would interact with your > efforts here to avoid violating atomicity at all Well, getting it right is certainly better than moving from a slow non-conforming behavior to a fast non-conforming behavior. ;-) -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
