On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Heikki Linnakangas >>> <heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> Are you saying you would accept the patch if we had this? >>> >>>> I think I would still be uncomfortable with the hacks in the page header. >>> >>> There are no "hacks". There are some carefully designed changes with >>> input from multiple people, including yourself, and it copes as >>> gracefully as it can with backwards compatibility requirements. >> >> You have comments from three different people, all experienced >> hackers, disagreeing with this position; > > Who is the third person you speak of? Perhaps they will speak again if > they wish to be heard.
Tom Lane. It was the very first email posted in response to the very first version of this patch you ever posted. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
