Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb:
>Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: >> I refreshed the patch so it works again on current HEAD. Basically >some >> trivial fixes and dfd26f9c5f371437f243249025863ea9911aacaa. The >latter doesn't >> seem necessary to me after the changes, so I simply ditched it. Am I >missing >> something? > >No, that was only needed because execMain.c was overriding somebody >else's tuple receiver. If you're putting the right receiver into the >QueryDesc to start with, it shouldn't be necessary. > >I'm confused by this though: > >> This basically includes a revert of >d8fb1f9adbddd1eef123d66a89a9fc0ecd96f60b > >I don't find that commit ID anywhere. That should have been the aforementioned commit. Must have screwed up the copy&paste buffer. Sorry for that. Andres Please excuse the brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
