2012/2/22 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.steh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I had to reply to query about usage VACUUM ANALYZE or ANALYZE. I >> expected so ANALYZE should be faster then VACUUM ANALYZE. >> >> But is not true. Why? > > I'm pretty sure that VACUUM ANALYZE *will* be faster than ANALYZE in > general, because VACUUM has to scan the whole table, and ANALYZE only > a fixed-size subset of its pages.
It sounds like you just said the opposite of what you wanted to say. Nicolas -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion. Q. Why is top posting bad? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
