On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:49 AM, Fujii Masao <masao.fu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +DATA = pg_stat_statements--1.1.sql pg_stat_statements--1.0--1.1.sql \
>> +       pg_stat_statements--unpackaged--1.0.sql
>>
>> Though I'm not familiar with CREATE EXTENSION. Why did you exclude 1.0.sql
>> from DATA? In hstore/Makefile, 1.0.sql is included. You think we should 
>> prevent
>> old version (i.e., 1.0) of pg_stat_statements from being used in 9.2?
>
> I'm not sure.  My feeling is that we probably don't want to ship all
> the old scripts forever.  People should install the latest version,
> and use the upgrade scripts to get there if they have an older one.
> So my gut feeling here is to change hstore to exclude that file rather
> than adding it here.  Any other opinions?

Agreed. But I wonder why VERSION option is usable in CREATE EXTENSION
if people always should use the latest version. Maybe I'm missing something..
Anyway, shipping v1.0 of pg_stat_statement seems less useful in 9.2, so
I agree to exclude it.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to