On 2012-02-20 06:37, Don Baccus wrote:
On Feb 19, 2012, at 7:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

It's not clear to me whether pure/leakproof functions are meant to be a
strict subset of immutable functions
Superset, not subset, unless my guessing is wrong.  How could "pure" be a subset of 
"immutable"?
If immutable functions are not necessarily leakproof/pure, and all leakproof/pure functions are immutable.

If the latter is not the case, "pure" leads to confusion as well.

What about "discreet"?

-- Yeb


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to