On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alexander Korotkov <aekorot...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Described differences leads to incorrect behaviour of GiST index. > The question is: what is correct way to fix it? Should on_pb also use FP* > or consistent method should behave like on_pb? > Any comments on this? Current behaviour definitely indicates a bug, and I'm ready to fix it. The only question: is this bug in on_pb or gist? ------ With best regards, Alexander Korotkov.
