2012/2/14 Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:55 AM, Kohei KaiGai <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> wrote: >> I could not find out where is the origin of grammer conflicts, although >> it does not conflict with any options within ALTER FUNCTION. >> >> Do you think the idea of ALTER ... NOT LEAKPROOF should be >> integrated within v9.2 timeline also? > > Yes. Did you notice that I attached a patch to make that work? I'll > commit that today or tomorrow unless someone comes up with a better > solution. > Yes. I'll be available to work on the feature based on this patch. It was a headache of mine to implement alter statement to add/remove leakproof attribute.
>>> I also think we ought to stick create_function_3 into one of the >>> parallel groups in the regression tests, if possible. Can you >>> investigate that? >>> >> Not yet. This test does not have dependency with other tests, >> so, I'm optimistic to run create_function_3 concurrently. > > Me, too. > I tried to move create_function_3 into the group of create_view and create_index, then it works correctly. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <kai...@kaigai.gr.jp> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
