"Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > Something to maybe add to the TODO list, if someone has the > time/inclination to work on it ... > > The problem with the current auth system, as I see it, is that you can't > easily have seperate user lists and passwords per database ... its shared > across the system ...
I don't see a problem with that in general. Other databases (like Informix) do it even worse and you need a UNIX or NIS account where the password is held! What would be good is IMHO to have GRANT|REVOKE CONNECT which defaults to REVOKE, so only superusers and the DB owner can connect, but that the owner later can change it without the need to edit hba.conf. Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] # ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
