Tom Lane wrote: > What I was concerned about was the case where GUC is trying to > re-establish an old value during transaction rollback. For example, > assume we are superuser to start with, and we do > > begin; > set role unprivileged_user; > ... > rollback; > > The rollback needs to transition the role setting back to > superuser. Sorry for missing the point. Yeah, I totally agree with that. > And yeah, I agree it's a bug that you can do what Kevin's example > shows. I'll look at it and see if I can pull together a patch. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
