> > My point was that there could still be a conflict against a user column > > that the user tries to create *later*. So it's illusory to think that > > making the name of a dropped column less predictable will improve > > matters. > > The simple (to describe, perhaps not to implement ;) way to resolve it > would be for the ADD COLUMN (or CREATE TABLE INHERITS) rename the > offending deleted column once more.
Hah! What a wonderful idea! Now why didn't I think of that! Chris ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
