On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I think that this would be a lot more clear if we described this as >> synchronous_commit = remote_write rather than just synchronous_commit >> = write. Actually, the internal constant is named that way already, >> but it's not exposed as such to the user. > > That's something to discuss at the end of the CF when people are less > busy and we get more input. > > It's an easy change whatever we decide to do.
Added this to 9.2 Open Items. Regards, -- Fujii Masao NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
