Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié ene 25 19:05:44 -0300 2012:
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> >
> > Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié ene 25 17:32:49 -0300 2012:
> >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:23 AM, Noah Misch <n...@leadboat.com> wrote:
> >> > New version that repairs a defective test case.
> >>
> >> Committed. I don't find this to be particularly good style:
> >>
> >> + for (i = 0; i < old_natts && ret; i++)
> >> + ret =
> >> (!IsPolymorphicType(get_opclass_input_type(classObjectId[i
> >> + irel->rd_att->attrs[i]->atttypid ==
> >> typeObjectId[i]);
> >>
> >> ...but I am not sure whether we have any formal policy against it, so
> >> I just committed it as-is for now. I would have surrounded the loop
> >> with an if (ret) block and written the body of the loop as if
> >> (condition) { ret = false; break; }.
> >
> > I find that code way too clever.
>
> The way he wrote it, or the way I proposed to write it?
The code as committed.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
