On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Simon Riggs <si...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Peter Geoghegan <pe...@2ndquadrant.com> > wrote: >> So, having received feedback from Tom and others in relation to this >> patch, I would like to state how I think I should go about addressing >> various concerns to ensure that a revision of the patch gets into the >> 9.2 release. As I've said time and again, I think that it is very >> important that we have this, sooner rather than later. > > Nothing can be ensured completely, but I would add this is a very > important feature. Without it, large systems without prepared > statements are mostly untunable and therefore untuned, which is a bad > thing.
I, too, am pretty excited about the potential for this feature. Having not read the patch I'm not able to comment on code quality or design at this point, but I'm definitely +1 on the concept. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
