On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 05:53:33PM +0900, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
> Hello, This is revised and rebased version of the patch.
>
> a. Old term `Add Tuple Function' is changed to 'Store
> Handler'. The reason why not `storage' is simply length of the
> symbols.
>
> b. I couldn't find the place to settle PGgetAsCString() in. It is
> removed and storeHandler()@dblink.c touches PGresAttValue
> directly in this new patch. Definition of PGresAttValue stays
> in lipq-fe.h and provided with comment.
>
> c. Refine error handling of dblink.c. I think it preserves the
> previous behavior for column number mismatch and type
> conversion exception.
>
> d. Document is revised.
First, my priority is one-the-fly result processing,
not the allocation optimizing. And this patch seems to make
it possible, I can process results row-by-row, without the
need to buffer all of them in PQresult. Which is great!
But the current API seems clumsy, I guess its because the
patch grew from trying to replace the low-level allocator.
I would like to propose better one-shot API with:
void *(*RowStoreHandler)(PGresult *res, PGresAttValue *columns);
where the PGresAttValue * is allocated once, inside PQresult.
And the pointers inside point directly to network buffer.
Ofcourse this requires replacing the current per-column malloc+copy
pattern with per-row parse+handle pattern, but I think resulting
API will be better:
1) Pass-through processing do not need to care about unnecessary
per-row allocations.
2) Handlers that want to copy of the row (like regular libpq),
can optimize allocations by having "global" view of the row.
(Eg. One allocation for row header + data).
This also optimizes call patterns - first libpq parses packet,
then row handler processes row, no unnecessary back-and-forth.
Summary - current API has various assumptions how the row is
processed, let's remove those.
--
marko
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
