On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> wrote: >> >> I think we should remove this from the TODO list, or at least document >> >> that there are a number of reasons why it might be a deeper hole than >> >> it appears to be at first glance. >> > >> > Maybe not remove it, but instead add a link to this discussion. >> >> I don't see what that accomplishes, unless someone's arguing that we >> really do want this behavior...? > > Well, it documents what happened when we tried to do it. Sort of like > "features we do not want". But then, maybe it's just TODO bloat.
I share your urge to memorialize the conversation somewhere, but I fear it will just cause future people to spend time thinking about it that isn't really warranted. I guess we could move it to the features we do not want section, but that's mostly bigger picture stuff. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
