On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 18:57, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 3:45 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 09:37, Greg Smith <g...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: >>>> And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the >>>> ability to post *reviews* in it, that would end up being properly >>>> threaded. >>> >>> Next you'll be saying we should have some sort of web application to help >>> with the whole review process, show the work on an integrated sort of Review >>> Board or something. What crazy talk. >> >> Well, it's early in the morning for being sunday, I blame that. >> >>> My contribution toward patch review ease for this week is that peg is quite >>> a bit smarter about referring to the correct part of the origin git repo >>> now, when you've been working on a branch for a while then create a new one: >>> https://github.com/gregs1104/peg >> >> Being able to refer to a git branch is one of those things that have >> been on the todo list for the cf app since pgcon last year... > > Do we have an actual written TODO list for the cf app somewhere? If > not, I think creating one would be a good idea. I realize I've been > remiss in addressing some of the things people want, but the lack of > any centralized place where such items are collected doesn't make it > simpler.
I don't think so - I've been keeping mine in your mailbox ;) A simple wiki page is probably enough - going for an actual tracker or anything seems vastly overkill... -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
