Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Have I ever mentioned that negative attno's is better
> > than the attisdropped flag implemetation in the handling
> > of gaps in attnums ?
>
> How so? I don't see any improvement ...
Sorry please ignore my above words if it has no meanig to you.
My comments about this item always seem to be misunderstood.
I've never intended to persist that my trial work using
negative attno's was better than the attisdropped implementa-
tion. I've only intended to guard my work from being evaluated
unfairly. In my feeling you evaluated my work unfairly without
any verfication twice. I've protected againast you about it
each time but never got your explicit reply. Or have I missed
your reply ?
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
http://w2422.nsk.ne.jp/~inoue/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
